top of page
Search
  • Bea Davy-Sutherland and Lulu McConville
  • Nov 13, 2020
  • 3 min read

Anti-racist work is a constant process, it is not fashionable and it is not optional.

We are the - newly renamed - Race & Ethnicity: Anti Racist Allyship Group. We were formerly known as the Anti Racist Working Group - but recently we have been beginning to recognise the potential negative consequences with identifying as a ‘working group’ rather than an allyship group.

Calling ourselves a working group produces a false and binary assumption - that R&E is not doing anti-racist work and that the ARWG is doing everything. This is absolutely not the case, in fact, we are entirely newly established, whereas, throughout LUC’s short history, dealing with racism within LUC has been the burden of the Race & Ethnicity Committee, its chairs, board members and BIPOC students. They have brought to light the ugly fruits of deep-rooted racism within our students, staff and institution.

So, why did we choose ‘allyship group’? We need to appeal to our target audience - white people. The vast majority of LUC is white, and racist remarks and microaggressions thrive in our white classroom environments based on our accommodating attitude towards the uncertainty that white students of LUC often have surrounding blatant racism and microaggressions and the often perceived good intentions behind discriminatory behaviour. We all deserve a space in which we can learn effectively and this should never be less so for our BIPOC peers. With this in mind, we are aiming to encourage the white people within our community to engage with the resources or events of the ARAG to examine themselves and their relation to their whiteness. The ARAG events and resources we are beginning to distribute are small tools primarily targeted towards the white student body, but by no means exclusively, to promote continuous self-reflection.

We also recognise the difficulties of using a word like ‘allyship’. The word ‘ally’ has connotations of exceptionalism as if doing basic anti-racist work in our communities everyday lives is deserving of a gold medal for effort. This is not the case and thus we want to emphasise that we do not use ‘ally’ as a gold star - we will not use it as an identifier at all. We only use ‘allyship’ in the continuous sense - not that we are allies, but that we are doing allyship. Anti-racist work is a constant process, it is not fashionable and it is not optional. According to Ibram X. Kendi, in our society, you are either anti-racist or racist. You cannot simply be not-racist. While we acknowledge Kendi is not the final word on this, we find this an effective stance through which to think about our relationship to racism and anti-racism. We endeavour to promote anti-racism and reflecting upon this as a continuous effort.

ARAG isn’t going to preach to you about how to be better. We are all still learning. ARAG simply is committed to lifelong unlearning and holding one another accountable so that the burden of change does not fall time after time solely on the BIPOC members of our community. We are not self-appointed allies but we are engaged in allyship work. The ARAG exists to support the incredible work which R&E has been carrying out for years, and as an additional group of responsibility towards antiracism for white students, teachers, and support staff in order to make sure that the conversations had last year do not simply become a ‘phase’ but instead become the beginning moment in which LUC - institution and community - makes tangible changes and listens to its students of colour.


 
 
 
  • Writer: Shivalika Madgulkar
    Shivalika Madgulkar
  • Nov 3, 2020
  • 4 min read

Shivalika Madgulkar, co-chair of Race and Ethnicity


I wonder why so many White people depend on my culture to “find” themselves, while I keep getting lost in theirs.

I’m Indian. Born and raised. At 16, I went to an international high school. One day, my classmate from Albania wanted to borrow my Sari to wear on the annual opening day of my school. Each year, the first day of school would be a day to wear your national dress (or clothing from a culture that best represented you).


Although it was a bit confusing to me why someone who was born and raised in Albania would want to wear a Sari on this day, this was not my main concern; it was the words she used to ask me for it.


“Can I borrow your Indian costume?”


I remember slightly flinching at this phrasing, but ultimately brushing it off as a linguistic confusion and lending it to her anyway. At 16, I did not have the principles, theories and words in place to have corrected her or asked her for clarification.


It is now 4 years later, and a casual disregard of my culture as a “costume,” I have realised, is hardly a scarce occurrence. I understand that “costume” technically means a set of clothing just like “b*tch” technically means a female dog or otter. Let’s face it, if I was wearing blue jeans and a T-shirt, one would have hardly said I was wearing a ‘costume.’ At the risk of being obvious, it seems like it needs to be spelled out: my sari is no different than your casual T-shirt/jeans combination. My mum wears one to work every day (she is an engineer). A sari is not a costume. Nor is a kurta. Nor is a pagdi. Or a bindi/bindu. You get the point.

It is difficult to identify and deconstruct events like these for me and many other Indians, because it is not only White Europeans/ North Americans that are desensitized to such casual mockery.


From Apu Nahasapeemapetilon (moving on from his ridiculous last name) in the Simpsons to Baljeet Tjinder in Phineas and Ferb, the Indian or South Asian characters have never been portrayed as complex, multidimensional, “normal” people. Their personality revolves around their ‘funny’ accents, extra-ordinary mathematical expertise or any other extremely reductive personality trait. Such a classic Indian trope appeared so frequently on television shows I saw as a kid, that at some point, I think, I no longer saw the issue.


To be an Indian or South Asian in a world of viral videos of White frat boys dancing to Daler Mehendi’s Tunak Tunak Tun while exceptionally butchering its lyrics and White and other non-South-Asians selling culturally significant items (mandalas, T-shirts with pictures Hindu Gods, yoga lessons) on online market platforms, is to be constantly frustrated.


It troubling to see a commodification and capitalisation of my culture from the hands of those who at best are not part of it, and at worst have historically participated in its marginalisation, It is furthermore upsetting to consider the fact that in appropriating South Asian cultural clothing and artefacts for a White taste, the history and context of that thing is ignored and forgotten.


How frequently do White Yoga instructors, I wonder, think about how Yoga is appropriated for a violent casteist agenda in India, or how Om as a religiously sacred Hindu symbol has extremely hateful connotations in Modi’s Hindu extremist India. I wonder how a White “yogi” might react to the weaponization of yoga, meditation and other Hindu symbols by the new Hindu nationalist Indian government. I wonder why the idea of peace and tranquility has been assigned to a country that, you know if you have been lucky to live in, is far from peaceful and tranquil.


I wonder why so many White people depend on my culture to “find” themselves, while I keep getting lost in theirs.


Whether it is Apu or Baljeet, a sari as a costume, or a mandala to cover up your AvB skyline, the rampant ignorance behind the use of South Asian cultural or religious artifacts is .... well, embarrassing. We’ve had many appropriation vs. appreciation debates, but I think a worthy food for thought is how many times appropriation is passed off as appreciation. If White frat boys dancing and senselessly singing along to Tunak Tunak Tun is an appreciation of Indian culture, or a White student mispronouncing “namaste” in the Pantomime or videos of the Dies Fatalis, then a deeper reflection of how we appreciate things is necessary. This form of ‘appreciative appropriation’ is no better than outright appropriation.


Anyone at LUC has sufficient resources to educate themselves about the historical, cultural and religious significance of these items and probably some or the other form of contact information of an Indian peer. All that’s left to do, is the effort.

Every layout comes with the latest social features built in. Readers will be able to easily share posts on social networks like Facebook and Twitter, view how many people have liked a post, made comments and more. With the Wix, building your online community has never been easier.

 
 
 
bottom of page